The effectiveness of co-created lifestyle interventions in improving health behaviour, physical and mental health in adults with non-communicable diseases: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Citation

Anieto EM, Dall PM, Abaraogu U, Chastin S, Anieto IB, Longworth GR, Adandom II, Onyeso OK, Iwuagwu AO, Smith N, Francis K, Ndubuaku M, Odom MC & Seenan C (2025) The effectiveness of co-created lifestyle interventions in improving health behaviour, physical and mental health in adults with non-communicable diseases: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Public Health, 248, Art. No.: 105929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105929

Abstract
Objectives This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of co-created lifestyle interventions in modifying health behaviour, and mental/physical health outcomes in individuals with non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Study design A systematic review of Randomized Control Trials (RCTs). Methods A systematic search of nine databases from inception until March 2023 was performed, plus weekly email alerts of new literature until March 2025. Studies comparing co-created lifestyle interventions with any control were included. Meta-analysis using the random effects model was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane-RoB-2, and quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE system. Results Sixteen RCTs (2201 participants; 74.2 % female; mean 53.8 years) were included. Meta-analysis showed that at <6 months, there is moderate quality evidence that co-created lifestyle interventions significantly improve health behaviour (moderate effect; SMD = 0.49, 95 %CI: 0.33–0.65) and physical health (small effect; SMD = 0.21, 95 %CI: 0.09–0.34), and mental health (small effect; SMD = 0.29, 95 %CI: 0.14–0.43), in individuals with NCDs. At ≥6 months, there is moderate quality evidence that co-created interventions improve health behaviour (small effect; SMD = 0.21, 95 %CI: 0.07–0.35), and mental health (small effect; SMD = 0.19, 95 %CI: 0.12–0.26). A small effect with low quality evidence (SMD = 0.11, 95 %CI: 0.09-0.32) was also observed for physical health, however, it was not statistically significant. Conclusions There is moderate quality evidence that co-created lifestyle interventions for secondary prevention of NCDs have a significant positive impact on the target health behaviour, and on mental health, and physical health outcomes.

Keywords
Co-creation; NCDs; Health behaviour; Mental health; Physical health; Systemic review

Journal
Public Health: Volume 248

• Published Version